On 8/31/24 18:43, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on 5be63fc19fcaa4c236b307420483578a56986a37] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20240830-175609 > base: 5be63fc19fcaa4c236b307420483578a56986a37 > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830095147.3538047-5-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com > patch subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] remoteproc: core: Add TEE interface support for firmware release > config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240901/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240901/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409010034.Tln3soEY-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:32: >>> include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h:52:12: warning: 'tee_rproc_parse_fw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 52 | static int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > vim +/tee_rproc_parse_fw +52 include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h > > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 51 > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 @52 static int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 53 { > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 54 /* This shouldn't be possible */ > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 55 WARN_ON(1); > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 56 > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 57 return 0; > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 58 } > 498143a453d14e Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-08-30 59 > The inline attribute is missing. As it is a minor fix, I'm waiting for more reviews before fixing it in the next version. Regards, Arnaud
