Hi, Am Samstag, 31. August 2024, 08:16:26 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 12:55:29AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > + clocks: > > + minItems: 4 > > + maxItems: 6 > > + items: > > + - description: Peripheral/APB bus clock > > + - description: EARC RX biphase clock > > + - description: Reference clock > > + - description: Audio interface clock > > + additionalItems: true > > What is the usefulness of all this? How can you even be sure that each > implementation of this core will have exactly these clocks? > > > + > > + clock-names: > > + minItems: 4 > > + maxItems: 6 > > + items: > > + - const: pclk > > + - const: earc > > + - const: ref > > + - const: aud > > + additionalItems: true > > + > > + interrupts: > > + minItems: 4 > > + maxItems: 5 > > + items: > > + - description: AVP Unit interrupt > > + - description: CEC interrupt > > + - description: eARC RX interrupt > > + - description: Main Unit interrupt > > If these are real pins, then this seems more possible, but > additionalItems does not make me happy. So while not "pins", the interrupts are separately specified in the SoC's list of interrupts in the GIC: RK3588 has: 201 irq_hdmitx0_oavp 202 irq_hdmitx0_ocec 203 irq_hdmitx0_oearcrx 204 irq_hdmitx0_omain 392 irq_hdmitx0_hpd and another set of all of them for hdmitx1 and RK3576 using the same hdmi IP has: 370 irq_hdmitx_oavp 371 irq_hdmitx_ocec 372 irq_hdmitx_oearcrx 373 irq_hdmitx_omain 399 irq_hdmitx_hpd so I guess the fifth interrupt is meant to be the hotplug? Though I guess this should be specificed in the name-list too.
