Re: [PATCH 3/3] of: property: Do some clean up with use of __free()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:06:26AM +0800, Zhang Zekun wrote:
> __free() provides a scoped of_node_put() functionality to put the
> device_node automatically, and we don't need to call of_node_put()
> directly. Let's simplify the code a bit with the use of __free().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 164d77cb9445..940324225c34 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -773,16 +773,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_port_parent);
>  struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(
>  			       const struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *np, *pp;
> -
>  	/* Get remote endpoint node. */
> -	np = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(node);
> -
> -	pp = of_graph_get_port_parent(np);
> +	struct device_node *np __free(device_node) =
> +		of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(node);
>  
> -	of_node_put(np);
> -
> -	return pp;
> +	return of_graph_get_port_parent(np);

Original code was obvious and simple. This is not an improvement.

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_remote_port_parent);
>  
> @@ -1064,19 +1059,15 @@ static void of_link_to_phandle(struct device_node *con_np,
>  			      struct device_node *sup_np,
>  			      u8 flags)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *tmp_np = of_node_get(sup_np);
> +	struct device_node *tmp_np __free(device_node) = of_node_get(sup_np);
>  
>  	/* Check that sup_np and its ancestors are available. */
>  	while (tmp_np) {
> -		if (of_fwnode_handle(tmp_np)->dev) {
> -			of_node_put(tmp_np);
> +		if (of_fwnode_handle(tmp_np)->dev)
>  			break;
> -		}
>  
> -		if (!of_device_is_available(tmp_np)) {
> -			of_node_put(tmp_np);
> +		if (!of_device_is_available(tmp_np))
>  			return;
> -		}
>  
>  		tmp_np = of_get_next_parent(tmp_np);
>  	}
> @@ -1440,16 +1431,13 @@ static int of_link_property(struct device_node *con_np, const char *prop_name)
>  		}
>  
>  		while ((phandle = s->parse_prop(con_np, prop_name, i))) {
> -			struct device_node *con_dev_np;
> +			struct device_node *con_dev_np __free(device_node) =
> +				s->get_con_dev ? s->get_con_dev(con_np) : of_node_get(con_np);
>  
> -			con_dev_np = s->get_con_dev
> -					? s->get_con_dev(con_np)
> -					: of_node_get(con_np);
>  			matched = true;
>  			i++;
>  			of_link_to_phandle(con_dev_np, phandle, s->fwlink_flags);
>  			of_node_put(phandle);
> -			of_node_put(con_dev_np);

Neither is this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux