On 2024/8/30 16:06, Thomas Bonnefille wrote:
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Thomas Bonnefille
<thomas.bonnefille@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "sg2002.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "LicheeRV Nano B";
+ compatible = "sipeed,licheerv-nano-b", "sipeed,licheerv-nano",
"sophgo,sg2002";
+
+ aliases {
+ gpio0 = &gpio0;
+ gpio1 = &gpio1;
+ gpio2 = &gpio2;
+ gpio3 = &gpio3;
+ serial0 = &uart0;
+ serial1 = &uart1;
+ serial2 = &uart2;
+ serial3 = &uart3;
+ serial4 = &uart4;
+ };
+
+ chosen {
+ stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
+ };
+};
+
+&osc {
+ clock-frequency = <25000000>;
+};
+
+&sdhci0 {
+ status = "okay";
+ bus-width = <4>;
+ no-1-8-v;
+ no-mmc;
+ no-sdio;
+ disable-wp;
+};
+
+&uart0 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&uart1 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&i2c0 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
--
2.45.2
Have you test you patch with a real board? Especially
for device "uart1" and "i2c0", I suspect your
configuartion does not work by default.
Hi, Thomas Bonnefille,
Can you please double check and feedback, I want to confirm this
before acking this change.
As you know, rc6 will come next week and I'm planning a pr next week.
Regards,
Chen
Hello Chen and Inochi,
I'm really sorry, indeed, those nodes certainly don't work, it was a
mistake on my side introduced between v1 and v2.
However, I can ensure that "uart0" and "sdhci0" are working fine.
May I suggest to remove those two nodes? I can send a new iteration if
it's easier for you to handle?
I'm fine with this, just go ahead please.
Thanks,
Chen
