> On 28 Aug 2024, at 7:07 PM, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 06:28:21PM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> Thanks both for the further feedback, agreed logical to use the >>> device vendor and panel serial number, ie "anbernic,wl-355608-a8". >>> Will post a V2 with a comment to that effect. >> >> Well in this case we can keep "wl-355608-a8", because the panel vendor >> _is not_ anbernic. > > And it's not a generic or ubiquitous device either. We've been over > this already, anbernic is the best we have. I don’t have a strong preference either way but agree the anbernic vendor string is the best compromise. Regards, Ryan
