Hi Alexandre,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:07:10AM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 8/7/24 11:38, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > Hello Oleksij,
> >
> > On 06.08.24 14:05, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > Rename 'pins1' to 'pins' in the qspi_bk1_pins_a node to correct the
> > > subnode name. The previous name caused the configuration to be
> > > applied to the wrong subnode, resulting in QSPI not working properly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp151a-prtt1l.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp151a-prtt1l.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp151a-prtt1l.dtsi
> > > index 3938d357e198f..4db684478c320 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp151a-prtt1l.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32mp151a-prtt1l.dtsi
> > > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ flash@0 {
> > > };
> > > &qspi_bk1_pins_a {
> > > - pins1 {
> > > + pins {
> >
> > As you have seen such device tree overriding is error prone and would
> > be entirely avoidable if specifying full board-specific pinctrl groups
> > was allowed for the stm32 platforms instead of override-and-pray.
>
> You can create your own pin group in stm32mp15-pinctlr.dtsi. What is the
> issue ? Do I miss something ? It will avoid to overwrite an existing
> configuration
There are mostly one one properly change (pull up), not really worth adding a
new sub node.
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
