Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Hardkernel ODROID-M1S

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 27. August 2024 13:29:34 MESZ schrieb Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx>:
>Hi Krzysztof,
>
>On 2024-08-27 08:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/08/2024 22:55, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>> The Hardkernel ODROID-M1S is a single-board computer based on Rockchip
>>> RK3566 SoC. It features e.g. 4/8 GB LPDDR4 RAM, 64 GB eMMC, SD-card,
>>> GbE LAN, HDMI 2.0, M.2 NVMe and USB 2.0/3.0.
>>>
>>> Add devicetree binding documentation for the Hardkernel ODROID-M1S board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>>> index f08e9f2f5dfc..9e29a5ecc94d 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>>> @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ properties:
>>>            - const: hardkernel,rk3568-odroid-m1
>>>            - const: rockchip,rk3568
>>>  
>>> +      - description: Hardkernel Odroid M1S
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - const: hardkernel,rk3566-odroid-m1s
>> 
>> hardkernel,odroid-m1s
>> 
>> Why adding SoC name to the board? Can it be Odroid M1S with RK3568?
>
>No, the M1S (rk3566) is a variant of the M1 (rk3568) with less features
>and the smaller SoC package, fully agree that hardkernel,odroid-m1s is
>better, will use it in a v2.
>
>I mainly wanted to keep it consistent to other Hardkernel Odroid boards.
>- hardkernel,rk3326-odroid-go2
>- hardkernel,rk3326-odroid-go2-v11
>- hardkernel,rk3326-odroid-go3
>- rockchip,rk3568-odroid-m1 (hardkernel,rk3568-odroid-m1)
>
>If you agree to a vendor prefix change of rockchip,rk3568-odroid-m1,
>maybe we can also drop the soc name from that compatible at the same
>time? E.g. change it to hardkernel,odroid-m1.

I'd also agree with going with compatibles without the soc name in it. It is an ABI break but I think except the chrome devices no other board actually uses that part of the compatible ?


>Regards,
>Jonas
>
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>> 
>

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux