Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64* Disable ethernet by default at SoC level

[Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 27.08.24 um 00:12 schrieb Logan Bristol:
> Hi Josua,
>
> On 8/25/2024 6:18 AM, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Hi Logan,
>>
>> Tank you for incorporating the requested changes,
>> unfortunately I found another mistake ... see below.
>>
>> Am 09.08.24 um 16:57 schrieb Logan Bristol:
>>> External interfaces should be disabled at the SoC DTSI level, since
>>> the node is incomplete. Disable Ethernet switch and ports in SoC DTSI
>>> and enable them in the board DTS. If the board DTS includes a SoM DTSI
>>> that completes the node description, enable the Ethernet switch and 
>>> ports
>>> in SoM DTSI.
>>>
>>> Reflect this change in SoM DTSIs by removing ethernet port disable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Bristol <logan.bristol@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Enabled cpsw3g and cpsw_port1 in SoM DTSI instead of board DTS
>>> if board DTS included SoM DTSI
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi               | 3 +++
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-phycore-som.dtsi        | 6 ++----
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts                | 3 +++
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts                 | 3 +++
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi            | 6 ++----
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-tqma64xxl-mbax4xxl.dts | 6 ++----
>>>    6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>> index f8370dd03350..69c5af58b727 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>> @@ -677,6 +677,7 @@ cpsw3g: ethernet@8000000 {
>>>            assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 13 9>;
>>>            clock-names = "fck";
>>>            power-domains = <&k3_pds 13 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>>> +        status = "disabled";
>>>               dmas = <&main_pktdma 0xC500 15>,
>>>                   <&main_pktdma 0xC501 15>,
>>> @@ -701,6 +702,7 @@ cpsw_port1: port@1 {
>>>                    phys = <&phy_gmii_sel 1>;
>>>                    mac-address = [00 00 00 00 00 00];
>>>                    ti,syscon-efuse = <&main_conf 0x200>;
>>> +                status = "disabled";
>>>                };
>>>                   cpsw_port2: port@2 {
>>> @@ -709,6 +711,7 @@ cpsw_port2: port@2 {
>>>                    label = "port2";
>>>                    phys = <&phy_gmii_sel 2>;
>>>                    mac-address = [00 00 00 00 00 00];
>>> +                status = "disabled";
>>>                };
>>>            };
>> ...
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>>> index c19d0b8bbf0f..a5cec9a07510 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>>> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ vdd_mmc0: regulator-vdd-mmc0 {
>>>    &cpsw3g {
>>>        pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>        pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_default_pins>;
>>> +    status = "okay";
>> correct
>>>    };
>>>       &cpsw3g_mdio {
>>> @@ -210,10 +211,7 @@ ethernet_phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>>    &cpsw_port1 {
>>>        phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>>>        phy-handle = <&ethernet_phy0>;
>> We use this port on the SoM, please set status okay.
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -&cpsw_port2 {
>>> -    status = "disabled";
>>> +    status = "okay";
>> We are not using this port on the SoM, drop node to keep status 
>> disabled.
>
> My understanding is that the cpsw_port1 node should be enabled and the 
> cpsw_port2 node should not exist in this DTSI. If my understanding is 
> correct, isn't that shown in this diff?

You are right, sorry about that ... my eyes missed the minuses :(

Acked-By: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>