On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
do you agree with this patchset ?
In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for
Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your
tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is
a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor
to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset
to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe
the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
