Hi Dragan,
On Monday, 26 August 2024 10:07:49 EDT Dragan Simic wrote:
> Hello Detlev,
>
> On 2024-08-23 15:20, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> > On Friday, 23 August 2024 03:00:57 EDT Dragan Simic wrote:
> >> Hello Detlev,
> >>
> >> Please see a comment below.
> >>
> >> On 2024-08-22 23:15, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> >> > On rk3576 the tunable clocks are inside the controller itself, removing
> >> > the need for the "ciu-drive" and "ciu-sample" clocks.
> >> >
> >> > That makes it a new type of controller that has its own dt_parse
> >> > function.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> >> > b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> >> > index 1458cb5fd5c7..7c8ccf5e71bc 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-rockchip.c
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> > @@ -435,13 +451,25 @@ static int dw_mci_rk3288_parse_dt(struct dw_mci
> >> > *host)
> >> >
> >> > if (IS_ERR(priv->sample_clk))
> >> >
> >> > dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu-sample not available\n");
> >> >
> >> > - host->priv = priv;
> >> > -
> >> >
> >> > priv->internal_phase = false;
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> >
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static int dw_mci_rk3576_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv;
> >> > + int err = dw_mci_common_parse_dt(host);
> >> > + if (err)
> >> > + return err;
> >> > +
> >> > + priv = host->priv;
> >> > +
> >> > + priv->internal_phase = true;
> >>
> >> Defining priv, assigning it and using it seems rather redundant,
> >> when all that's needed is simple "host->priv->internal_phase = true"
> >> assignment instead.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I did at first, but host->priv is declared as void*,
> > which
> > means it needs to be cast to struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data * and I
> > felt
> > that
> >
> > ((struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *)host->priv)->internal_phase =
> > true;
> >
> > is not very pretty and harder to read.
>
> Ah, you're right, and I somehow managed to ignore that.
>
> I agree with your conclusions, although I'd suggest something like
> this, for slightly improved readability:
>
> +static int dw_mci_rk3576_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
> +{
> + struct dw_mci_rockchip_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = dw_mci_common_parse_dt(host);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + priv->internal_phase = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
That won't work either, because host->priv is initialized in
dw_mci_common_parse_dt.
