Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 5:08 PM Kryštof Černý <cleverline1mc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am sorry if the message is wrong, this is my first patch ever sent to > the Linux kernel. I have checked the schematic of the board and it > shares the same power line with mmc0, so I assumed I can use the same > regulator. Thanks for your feedback and I would be glad for your further > response. So some of the pin groups do have dedicated supplies, and should thus be described, but not all of them. The schematic only shows dedicated supplies for PD and PG pingroups. So just add those. PD supply is from 2.5V ethernet PHY I/O regulator supply, so you would need to add that as well. The datasheet also mentions a separate supply pin for PC pingroup, but it is not shown in the schematic. I would just omit that. And as Krzysztof mentioned, device tree changes should be to model the hardware, not to work around some operating system warning. At least most of the time that is. So your commit message should also be about fixing the description or providing more detail, and not about the operating system. ChenYu > Dne 24. 08. 24 v 9:40 Krzysztof Kozlowski napsal(a): > > On 24/08/2024 09:09, Kryštof Černý wrote: > >> The board does not have a dedicated regulator for pio and r_pio, > >> but this fixes the kernel warning about dummy regulators being used. > >> Tested on the actual board. > >> > > Judging by commit msg these are not correct regulators. Please do not > > add incorrect hardware description to silence some warnings coming from > > OS. Either you need proper (correct) hardware description or fix the > > problem other way, assuming there is anything to fix in the first place. > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > >
