On Friday 13 March 2015 12:11:27 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:57:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 12 March 2015 18:30:21 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove/pmu.txt | 49 +++ > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi | 25 ++ > > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 + > > > drivers/base/platform.c | 2 + > > > drivers/base/power/common.c | 15 + > > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 33 +- > > > drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/soc/dove/Makefile | 1 + > > > drivers/soc/dove/pmu.c | 399 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/pm.h | 1 + > > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 4 + > > > include/linux/soc/dove/pmu.h | 6 + > > > 12 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > I see add the header file and the global dove_init_pmu() function, > > but I don't see a caller of that function. Is that intentional, or > > did you accidentally leave out another patch that you meant to include? > > I kind'a did - it needs an explicit call from arch/arm/mach-mvebu/dove.c > which I haven't added even in my tree (because I don't use that path, > even when I test DT booting - I still use most of the arch/arm/mach-dove > code when DT booting.) I'll add that now. > > Of course, I also have a patch which adds legacy support to > arch/arm/mach-dove, but I've assumed you're not interested in that... You mean legacy support in mach-mvebu? I don't mind that at all, it was the mvebu maintainers that decided it would be best to combine the multiplatform and DT work in order to simplify both. I've also sent a patch set that moves mach-dove into multiplatform, which is a different way of doing the same thing. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
