On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:34:54AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Which of spin-table/psci are you planning on using for SMP support, and > > > when would that be likely to appear? > > > > We have a qcom specific SMP enablement method for this device. This > > was one of our first devices so it utilized as much from arm 32-bit as > > possible. > > Implementation specific enable methods are something we really don't > want to see for arm64. I fully agree (and we've been stating this for over two years). > If PSCI is out of the question then a spin-table shim in your > bootloader shouldn't be too hard to implement. And I guess only WFI cpuidle supported in Linux. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
