> -----Original Message----- > From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2024年8月23日 0:14 > To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx> > Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; > pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx; > hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrei Botila (OSS) > <andrei.botila@xxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] net: phy: tja11xx: replace > "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" with "nxp,phy-output-refclk" > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 09:37:11AM +0000, Wei Fang wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: 2024年8月22日 16:47 > > > To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; > > > pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > > > conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx; > > > hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrei Botila (OSS) > > > <andrei.botila@xxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/3] net: phy: tja11xx: replace > > > "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" with "nxp,phy-output-refclk" > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 09:37:20AM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > > > > As the new property "nxp,phy-output-refclk" is added to instead of > > > > the "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" property, so replace the "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" > > > > property used in the driver with the "nxp,reverse-mode" property > > > > and make slight modifications. > > > > > > Can you explain what makes this backwards compatible please? > > > > > It does not backward compatible, the related PHY nodes in DTS also > > need to be updated. I have not seen "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" used in the > > upstream. > > Since you have switched the polarity, devicestrees that contain > "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" would actually not need an update to preserve > functionality. However... > > > For nodes that do not use " nxp,rmii-refclk-in", they need to be > > updated, but unfortunately I cannot confirm which DTS use TJA11XX PHY, > > and there may be no relevant nodes in upstream DTS. > > ...as you say here, all tja11xx phy nodes that do not have the property would > need to be updated to retain functionality. Given you can't even determine > which devicetrees would need to be updated, I'm going to have to NAK this > change as an unnecessary ABI break. > Okay, that make sense, "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" was added only for TJA1100 and TJA1101, although it does not seem to be a suitable property now, it cannot be changed at present. :( Since TJA1103/TJA1104/TJA1120/TJA1121 use different driver than TJA1100 and TJA1101, which is nxp-c4-tja11xx. I think it's fine to add " nxp,phy-output-refclk " for these PHYs, so I will remove this patch from the patch set.