Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: access-controllers: add controller configuration property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/16/24 18:14, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
Add a pattern property that allows to define several controller
configuration in the device tree. It allows run-time controller
reconfiguration for an authorized entity as in OP-TEE OS [1].

Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/6946 [1]
---
  .../access-controllers/access-controllers.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controllers.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controllers.yaml
index 99e2865f0e46..88824719bb73 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controllers.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/access-controllers/access-controllers.yaml
@@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ properties:
        A list of access controller specifiers, as defined by the
        bindings of the access-controllers provider.
+patternProperties:
+  ".*(?<=)-access-conf$":
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+    description:
+      Contains a list of inseparable access controller specifiers that forms
+      an access controller configuration.
+
  additionalProperties: true
examples:
@@ -81,4 +88,15 @@ examples:
                                   <&bus_controller 1 3 5>;
              access-controller-names = "clock", "bus";
          };
+
+        uart5: serial@60200 {
+          reg = <0x60200 0x400>;
+          clocks = <&clk_serial2>;
+          access-controllers = <&bus_controller 0 0 0>, <&bus_controller 1 0 0>,
+                               <&clock_controller 2 3>;
+          default-access-conf = <&bus_controller 0 10 0>,
+                                <&bus_controller 1 10 0>;
+          shared-access-conf = <&bus_controller 0 256 4>,
+                               <&bus_controller 1 256 4>;
+        };
      };

Hi,

Looking back at this, I think it would be coherent to declare a
dedicated cell definition for this property. It makes little sense
to base it on the #access-controllers-cells as there could be
different arguments. Maybe #access-conf-cells.

Then, I should change the description as this property should describe
a list of access controller configuration entries. This list can contain
references to one or more controller.

What are your thoughts?

Best regards,
Gatien




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux