On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:39:42AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 8/16/24 10:02, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:07:47AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > Some shared memory areas might only support a certain access width, > > > such as 32-bit, which memcpy_{from,to}_io() does not adhere to at least > > > on ARM64 by making both 8-bit and 64-bit accesses to such memory. > > > > > > Update the shmem layer to support reading from and writing to such > > > shared memory area using the specified I/O width in the Device Tree. The > > > various transport layers making use of the shmem.c code are updated > > > accordingly to pass the I/O accessors that they store. > > > > > > > Hi Florian, > > Hi, > > I gave it ago at this on a JUNO regarding the mailbox/shmem transport > > without any issue. I'll have a go later on an OPTEE/shmem scenario too. > > > > This looks fundamentally good to me, since you moved all ops setup at > > setup time and you keep the pointers per-channel instead of global... > > Thanks! > [snip] > > > + > > > > There are a bunch of warn/errs from checkpatch --strict, beside the volatile > > here and on the previous typedefs, also about args reuse and trailing semicolon > > in these macros... > > I don't think we can silence the volatile ones, checkpatch --strict did not > complain about the typedefs in my case, what did it look like in yours? ...I dont get warns on new typedefs..only on volatile and macro args reuse ---8<--- WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #36: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h:322: +typedef void (*shmem_copy_toio_t)(volatile void __iomem *to, const void *from, WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #38: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h:324: +typedef void (*shmem_copy_fromio_t)(void *to, const volatile void __iomem *from, CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'amt' - possible side-effects? #94: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:37: +#define SHMEM_IO_OPS(w, s, amt) \ +static inline void shmem_memcpy_fromio##s(void *to, \ + const volatile void __iomem *from, \ + size_t count) \ +{ \ + while (count) { \ + *(u##s *)to = __raw_read##w(from); \ + from += amt; \ + to += amt; \ + count -= amt; \ + } \ +} \ +static inline void shmem_memcpy_toio##s(volatile void __iomem *to, \ + const void *from, \ + size_t count) \ +{ \ + while (count) { \ + __raw_write##w(*(u##s *)from, to); \ + from += amt; \ + to += amt; \ + count -= amt; \ + } \ +} \ +static struct scmi_shmem_io_ops shmem_io_ops##s = { \ + .fromio = shmem_memcpy_fromio##s, \ + .toio = shmem_memcpy_toio##s, \ +}; WARNING: macros should not use a trailing semicolon #94: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:37: +#define SHMEM_IO_OPS(w, s, amt) \ +static inline void shmem_memcpy_fromio##s(void *to, \ + const volatile void __iomem *from, \ + size_t count) \ +{ \ + while (count) { \ + *(u##s *)to = __raw_read##w(from); \ + from += amt; \ + to += amt; \ + count -= amt; \ + } \ +} \ +static inline void shmem_memcpy_toio##s(volatile void __iomem *to, \ + const void *from, \ + size_t count) \ +{ \ + while (count) { \ + __raw_write##w(*(u##s *)from, to); \ + from += amt; \ + to += amt; \ + count -= amt; \ + } \ +} \ +static struct scmi_shmem_io_ops shmem_io_ops##s = { \ + .fromio = shmem_memcpy_fromio##s, \ + .toio = shmem_memcpy_toio##s, \ +}; WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #96: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:39: + const volatile void __iomem *from, \ WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #106: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:49: +static inline void shmem_memcpy_toio##s(volatile void __iomem *to, \ WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #128: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:71: + const volatile void __iomem *from, WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst #134: FILE: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/shmem.c:77: +static inline void shmem_memcpy_toio(volatile void __iomem *to, total: 0 errors, 7 warnings, 1 checks, 312 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. "[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Support 'reg-io-width' property for" has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. ---8<----