On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 01:51:25PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> As the new property "nxp,reverse-mode" is added to instead of the
> "nxp,rmii-refclk-in" property, so replace the "nxp,rmii-refclk-in"
> property used in the driver with the "nxp,reverse-mode" property
> and make slight modifications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/nxp-tja11xx.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-tja11xx.c b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-tja11xx.c
> index 2c263ae44b4f..a3721f91689b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/nxp-tja11xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/nxp-tja11xx.c
> @@ -78,8 +78,7 @@
> #define MII_COMMCFG 27
> #define MII_COMMCFG_AUTO_OP BIT(15)
>
> -/* Configure REF_CLK as input in RMII mode */
> -#define TJA110X_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_IN BIT(0)
> +#define TJA11XX_REVERSE_MODE BIT(0)
>
> struct tja11xx_priv {
> char *hwmon_name;
> @@ -274,10 +273,10 @@ static int tja11xx_get_interface_mode(struct phy_device *phydev)
> mii_mode = MII_CFG1_REVMII_MODE;
> break;
> case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
> - if (priv->flags & TJA110X_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_IN)
> - mii_mode = MII_CFG1_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_IN;
> - else
> + if (priv->flags & TJA11XX_REVERSE_MODE)
> mii_mode = MII_CFG1_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_OUT;
> + else
> + mii_mode = MII_CFG1_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_IN;
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -517,8 +516,8 @@ static int tja11xx_parse_dt(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_MDIO))
> return 0;
>
> - if (of_property_read_bool(node, "nxp,rmii-refclk-in"))
> - priv->flags |= TJA110X_RMII_MODE_REFCLK_IN;
Hi,
I am curious to know if there are any backwards compatibility
issues to be considered in making this change.
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "nxp,reverse-mode"))
> + priv->flags |= TJA11XX_REVERSE_MODE;
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
