On 12/08/2024 04:16, Tingwei Zhang wrote: > On 8/8/2024 7:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/08/2024 13:04, Tingwei Zhang wrote: >>> On 8/7/2024 5:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 07/08/2024 11:17, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/7/2024 3:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>>> On 06/08/2024 06:19, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>>>>>> Add QCS9100 compatible in sa8775p ride and sa8775p ride r3 board DTS. >>>>>>> QCS9100 references SA8775p, they share the same SoC DTSI and board DTS. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't understand this. You claim here that QCS9100 references SA8775p >>>>>> but your diff says other way: SA8775p references QCS9100. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, that's confusing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Krzysztof >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I will update the compatible as follows to indicate that QCS9100 >>>>> references SA8775p. >>>>> >>>>> compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-ride", "qcom,qcs9100", "qcom,sa8775p"; >>>> >>>> Is this still correct, though? sa8775p won't come with qcs9100 SoC. >>> We have a new board. Hardware is same as sa877p-ride except sa8775p is >>> replaced with qcs9100. We add qcs9100 SoC compatible to sa8775p-ride >> >> Does "new board" mean that "old board" disappears? No users to care >> about it? Or just the existing board is being changed (like new revision)? > > We will support both boards. Sa8775p-ride board with sa8775p chipset and > sa8775p-ride board with qcs9100 chipset. Both of them can be used for > development. Patch does something else then - changes compatibles for the existing (old) board. Best regards, Krzysztof
