On 06/08/2024 19:00, Michael Nemanov wrote: > sdio.c implements SDIO transport functions. These are bound into > struct cc33xx_if_operations and accessed via io.h in order to abstract > multiple transport interfaces such as SPI in the future. > The CC33xx driver supports the SDIO in-band IRQ option so the IRQ from > the device received here as well. > Unlike wl1xxx products, there is no longer mapping between > HW and SDIO / SPI address space of any kind. > There are only 3 valid addresses for control, data and status > transactions each with a predefined structure. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Nemanov <michael.nemanov@xxxxxx> ... > + > +#include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h> > +#include <linux/mmc/host.h> > +#include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h> > + > +#include "cc33xx.h" > +#include "io.h" > + > +#ifndef SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI > +#define SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI 0x0097 > +#endif > + > +#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_CC33XX_NO_EFUSE 0x4076 > +#define SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_CC33XX 0x4077 > + > +static bool dump; Drop. > + > +struct cc33xx_sdio_glue { > + struct device *dev; > + struct platform_device *core; > +}; > + > +static const struct sdio_device_id cc33xx_devices[] = { > + { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_CC33XX) }, > + { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_CC33XX_NO_EFUSE) }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, cc33xx_devices); Keep all tables next to each other - bottom of the driver. Spreading same type of structures over the file does not help in review. > + > + > +static struct cc33xx_if_operations sdio_ops_gpio_irq = { Why this is not const? > + .interface_claim = cc33xx_sdio_claim, > + .interface_release = cc33xx_sdio_release, > + .read = cc33xx_sdio_raw_read, > + .write = cc33xx_sdio_raw_write, > + .power = cc33xx_sdio_set_power, > + .set_block_size = cc33xx_sdio_set_block_size, > + .set_irq_handler = cc33xx_set_irq_handler, > + .disable_irq = cc33xx_disable_line_irq, > + .enable_irq = cc33xx_enable_line_irq, > +}; > + > +static struct cc33xx_if_operations sdio_ops_inband_irq = { > + .interface_claim = cc33xx_sdio_claim, > + .interface_release = cc33xx_sdio_release, > + .read = cc33xx_sdio_raw_read, > + .write = cc33xx_sdio_raw_write, > + .power = cc33xx_sdio_set_power, > + .set_block_size = cc33xx_sdio_set_block_size, > + .set_irq_handler = cc33xx_set_irq_handler, > + .disable_irq = cc33xx_sdio_disable_irq, > + .enable_irq = cc33xx_sdio_enable_irq, > +}; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +static const struct cc33xx_family_data cc33xx_data = { > + .name = "cc33xx", > + .cfg_name = "ti-connectivity/cc33xx-conf.bin", > + .nvs_name = "ti-connectivity/cc33xx-nvs.bin", > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id cc33xx_sdio_of_match_table[] = { > + { .compatible = "ti,cc3300", .data = &cc33xx_data }, > + { .compatible = "ti,cc3301", .data = &cc33xx_data }, > + { .compatible = "ti,cc3350", .data = &cc33xx_data }, > + { .compatible = "ti,cc3351", .data = &cc33xx_data }, > + { } > +}; Eh? What happened here? So devices are compatibles thus make them compatible in the bindings. > + > +static int sdio_cc33xx_probe(struct sdio_func *func, > + const struct sdio_device_id *id) > +{ > + struct cc33xx_platdev_data *pdev_data; > + struct cc33xx_sdio_glue *glue; > + struct resource res[1]; > + mmc_pm_flag_t mmcflags; > + int ret = -ENOMEM; > + int gpio_irq, wakeirq, irq_flags; > + const char *chip_family; > + > + /* We are only able to handle the wlan function */ > + if (func->num != 0x02) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + pdev_data = devm_kzalloc(&func->dev, sizeof(*pdev_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pdev_data) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + glue = devm_kzalloc(&func->dev, sizeof(*glue), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!glue) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + glue->dev = &func->dev; > + > + /* Grab access to FN0 for ELP reg. */ > + func->card->quirks |= MMC_QUIRK_LENIENT_FN0; > + > + /* Use block mode for transferring over one block size of data */ > + func->card->quirks |= MMC_QUIRK_BLKSZ_FOR_BYTE_MODE; > + > + ret = cc33xx_probe_of(&func->dev, &gpio_irq, &wakeirq, pdev_data); > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > + /* if sdio can keep power while host is suspended, enable wow */ > + mmcflags = sdio_get_host_pm_caps(func); > + dev_dbg(glue->dev, "sdio PM caps = 0x%x\n", mmcflags); > + > + sdio_set_drvdata(func, glue); > + > + /* Tell PM core that we don't need the card to be powered now */ > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&func->dev); > + > + chip_family = "cc33xx"; That's usless assignment. > + > + glue->core = platform_device_alloc(chip_family, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO); > + if (!glue->core) { > + dev_err(glue->dev, "can't allocate platform_device"); > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > + > + glue->core->dev.parent = &func->dev; > + > + if (gpio_irq) { > + dev_info(glue->dev, "Using GPIO as IRQ\n"); Drop. Driver should be silent. > + > + irq_flags = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(gpio_irq)); > + > + irq_set_status_flags(gpio_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN); > + > + if (irq_flags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW)) > + irq_flags |= IRQF_ONESHOT; > + > + ret = request_threaded_irq(gpio_irq, gpio_irq_hard_handler, > + gpio_irq_thread_handler, > + irq_flags, glue->core->name, func); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(glue->dev, "can't register GPIO IRQ handler\n"); > + goto out_dev_put; > + } > + > + pdev_data->gpio_irq_num = gpio_irq; > + > + if ((mmcflags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER) && > + (enable_irq_wake(gpio_irq) == 0)) > + pdev_data->pwr_in_suspend = true; > + > + pdev_data->if_ops = &sdio_ops_gpio_irq; > + } else { > + dev_info(glue->dev, "Using SDIO in-band IRQ\n"); > + > + pdev_data->if_ops = &sdio_ops_inband_irq; > + } > + > + if (wakeirq > 0) { > + res[0].start = wakeirq; > + res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ | > + irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(wakeirq)); > + res[0].name = "wakeirq"; > + > + ret = platform_device_add_resources(glue->core, res, 1); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(glue->dev, "can't add resources\n"); > + goto out_dev_put; > + } > + } > + > + ret = platform_device_add_data(glue->core, pdev_data, > + sizeof(*pdev_data)); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(glue->dev, "can't add platform data\n"); > + goto out_dev_put; > + } > + > + ret = platform_device_add(glue->core); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(glue->dev, "can't add platform device\n"); > + goto out_dev_put; > + } > + return 0; > + > +out_dev_put: > + platform_device_put(glue->core); > + > + if (pdev_data->gpio_irq_num) > + free_irq(pdev_data->gpio_irq_num, func); > + > +out: > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void sdio_cc33xx_remove(struct sdio_func *func) > +{ > + struct cc33xx_sdio_glue *glue = sdio_get_drvdata(func); > + struct platform_device *pdev = glue->core; > + struct cc33xx_platdev_data *pdev_data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); > + > + /* Undo decrement done above in sdio_cc33xx_probe */ > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&func->dev); > + > + platform_device_unregister(glue->core); > + > + if (pdev_data->gpio_irq_num) { > + free_irq(pdev_data->gpio_irq_num, func); > + if (pdev_data->pwr_in_suspend) > + disable_irq_wake(pdev_data->gpio_irq_num); > + } else { > + sdio_claim_host(func); > + sdio_release_irq(func); > + sdio_release_host(func); > + } > +} > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > +static int cc33xx_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + /* Tell MMC/SDIO core it's OK to power down the card > + * (if it isn't already), but not to remove it completely > + */ > + struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(dev); > + struct cc33xx_sdio_glue *glue = sdio_get_drvdata(func); > + struct cc33xx *cc = platform_get_drvdata(glue->core); > + mmc_pm_flag_t sdio_flags; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (!cc) { > + dev_err(dev, "no wilink module was probed\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "cc33xx suspend. keep_device_power: %d\n", > + cc->keep_device_power); > + > + if (cc->keep_device_power) { > + sdio_flags = sdio_get_host_pm_caps(func); > + > + if (!(sdio_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER)) { > + dev_err(dev, "can't keep power while host is suspended\n"); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* keep power while host suspended */ > + ret = sdio_set_host_pm_flags(func, MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "error while trying to keep power\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + } > +out: > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int cc33xx_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + dev_dbg(dev, "cc33xx resume\n"); I asked to drop such silly confirmation messages. Kernel has already infrastructure for this. > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct dev_pm_ops cc33xx_sdio_pm_ops = { > + .suspend = cc33xx_suspend, > + .resume = cc33xx_resume, > +}; > + > +static struct sdio_driver cc33xx_sdio_driver = { > + .name = "cc33xx_sdio", > + .id_table = cc33xx_devices, > + .probe = sdio_cc33xx_probe, > + .remove = sdio_cc33xx_remove, > + .drv = { > + .pm = &cc33xx_sdio_pm_ops, > + }, > +}; > +#else No, that's terrible, you cannot have two drivers! Look how drivers are doing - there is a wrapper or just use maybe_unused. > +static struct sdio_driver cc33xx_sdio_driver = { > + .name = "cc33xx_sdio", > + .id_table = cc33xx_devices, > + .probe = sdio_cc33xx_probe, > + .remove = sdio_cc33xx_remove, > +}; > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM */ > + > +static int __init sdio_cc33xx_init(void) > +{ > + return sdio_register_driver(&cc33xx_sdio_driver); > +} > + > +static void __exit sdio_cc33xx_exit(void) > +{ > + sdio_unregister_driver(&cc33xx_sdio_driver); > +} > + > +module_init(sdio_cc33xx_init); > +module_exit(sdio_cc33xx_exit); Look at other drivers how they do it - there is a wrapper. > + > +module_param(dump, bool, 0600); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(dump, "Enable sdio read/write dumps."); This should be rather debug interface, not module param. > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SDIO transport for Texas Instruments CC33xx WLAN driver"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Michael Nemanov <michael.nemanov@xxxxxx>"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sabeeh Khan <sabeeh-khan@xxxxxx>"); Best regards, Krzysztof