On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:56:39 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/08/2024 17:14, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Define power domain IDs as described in the TRM. > > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are > explained here: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche > s.html#i-for-patch-submitters > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [reword] > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > This is part of bindings. > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > Missing vendor prefix. This should be named after compatible. Looks like all other rockchip power bindings use the include/dt-bindings/ power/rkXXXX.h format. Should I keep that way ? > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..cb33a32c1aed9 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3576-power.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ > > Weird license. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
