Hello Eliad,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When running with device-tree, we no longer have a board file
> that can set up the platform data for wlcore.
> Allow this data to be passed from DT.
>
> For now, parse only the irq used. Other (optional) properties
> can be added later on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
I see this is a v5 but I don't know what was changed from prior
revisions. It would be good if the patches had a versions history.
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> index d3dd7bf..ee556ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #include <linux/wl12xx.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> #include "wlcore.h"
> #include "wl12xx_80211.h"
> @@ -214,6 +216,69 @@ static struct wl1271_if_operations sdio_ops = {
> .set_block_size = wl1271_sdio_set_block_size,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id wlcore_sdio_of_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1801" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1805" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1807" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1831" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1835" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,wl1837" },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static struct wl12xx_platform_data *wlcore_probe_of(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata;
> +
> + if (!np || !of_match_node(wlcore_sdio_of_match_table, np))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
> + if (!pdata->irq) {
> + dev_err(dev, "No irq in platform data\n");
> + kfree(pdata);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return pdata;
> +}
> +#else
> +static struct wl12xx_platform_data *wlcore_probe_of(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct wl12xx_platform_data *
> +wlcore_get_platform_data(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata;
> +
> + /* first, look for DT data */
I thought it was the opposite, that platform data should over-rule DT.
That way you can still use the data filled in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c even after the driver supports your
new DT binding.
> + pdata = wlcore_probe_of(dev);
> + if (pdata)
> + return pdata;
> +
> + /* if not found - fallback to static platform data */
> + pdata = wl12xx_get_platform_data();
> + if (!IS_ERR(pdata))
> + return kmemdup(pdata, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + dev_err(dev, "No platform data set\n");
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void wlcore_del_platform_data(struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + kfree(pdata);
> +}
> +
This function seems to be an unnecessary, why not just call kfree() directly?
Or better, maybe the resource-managed devm_*() functions can be used
so the data doesn't have to be explicitly freed?
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
