On Wednesday 25 February 2015 16:24:06 Arun Ramamurthy wrote: > >>> Should I run this by Alan Stern? > >> > >> I've added him to Cc here. He clearly didn't know the background about > >> the DT binding change, and should not need to, but he may have an opinion > >> on what names we should use. > >> > > > Arnd, should I re patch the ehci-platform driver to avoid phy-names > entirely? Alan, if not do you have an opinion on what the usb phy names > should be? The current patch uses "usbp" + port number such as "usbp0" , > "usbp1" etc I think avoiding the phy names would be best here, but it requires a kernel API change first, because we do not have a way to get a phy by index as we do for other subsystems (e.g. clocks or gpios). Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
