Hi Pierre, On 8/1/2024 1:33 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 8/1/24 03:17, Wesley Cheng wrote: >> For USB offloading situations, the AFE port start command will result in a >> QMI handshake between the Q6DSP and the main processor. Depending on if >> the USB bus is suspended, this routine would require more time to complete, >> as resuming the USB bus has some overhead associated with it. Increase the >> timeout to 3s to allow for sufficient time for the USB QMI stream enable >> handshake to complete. >> >> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c >> index 948007955934..452d7e8b9b30 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6afe.c >> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ >> #define AFE_API_VERSION_SLOT_MAPPING_CONFIG 1 >> #define AFE_API_VERSION_CODEC_DMA_CONFIG 1 >> >> -#define TIMEOUT_MS 1000 >> +#define TIMEOUT_MS 3000 > Surprising that 1s is not enough to resume a bus, and conversely is 3s > enough then if the overhead is so significant? > It looks like either too much or too little... To clarify, if USB bus suspend isn't enabled, then this isn't an issue. I just picked 3s since this is a worst case timeout value. I don't think it will take longer than that to start an audio session, otherwise there is another inherent problem. When I initially tested this, it may have been on a platform/chipset that wasn't running with optimized CPU settings, and might have been running slower overall. Thanks Wesley Cheng >> #define AFE_CMD_RESP_AVAIL 0 >> #define AFE_CMD_RESP_NONE 1 >> #define AFE_CLK_TOKEN 1024
