On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:04:53AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:10:12PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote: > > > The ACSPCIE_PROXY_CTRL registers within the CTRL_MMR space of TI's J784S4 > > > SoC are used to drive the reference clock to the PCIe Endpoint device via > > > the PAD IO Buffers. Add the compatible for allowing the PCIe driver to > > > obtain the regmap for the ACSPCIE_CTRL register within the System > > > Controller device-tree node in order to enable the PAD IO Buffers. > > > > > > The Technical Reference Manual for J784S4 SoC with details of the > > > ASCPCIE_CTRL registers is available at: > > > https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spruj52 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@xxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patch is based on linux-next tagged next-20240729. > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240715120936.1150314-2-s-vadapalli@xxxxxx/ > > > Changes since v1: > > > - Rebased patch on next-20240729. > > > - Separated this patch from the series. > > > - Collected Acked-by tag from: > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/04d94188-5e30-4cab-b534-e97c0b2a61f3@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > NOTE: Though it was mentioned on 25th July 2024 that this patch was applied: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/172190301400.925833.12525656543896105526.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > since I did not find the commit in the MFD tree and the Linux-Next tree, > > > I am reposting this patch. > > > > That's because it was in the middle of the merge window and only fixes > > get published during that time. That's now over, so it should get > > published soon. However, maintainers get busy on other work or take > > vacation, so it could be delayed. > > > > Unless a maintainer updates their tree with other later patches and your > > patch is not there, no reason to worry and resend. Thanks Rob. > I was under the assumption that a commit ID is mentioned after the patch > gets applied to the Maintainer's tree and is visible publicly. Thank you > for clarifying the details regarding the process followed. I will make > sure to wait long enough before resending any patches in the future. Pushed now. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
