On 31/07/2024 17:22, Trevor Gamblin wrote: > > On 2024-07-31 10:11 a.m., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 31/07/2024 15:48, Trevor Gamblin wrote: >>> This adds a binding specification for the Analog Devices Inc. AD7625, >>> AD7626, AD7960, and AD7961 ADCs. >> Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See >> longer explanation here: >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95 > Will do. >> >> Why this is not ready, but RFC? What exactly needs to be commented here? > There's one outstanding question about whether or not there should be a > DT property for specifying whether DCO+/- lines are connected (mentioned > in the cover letter but not here). I guess it doesn't need to be an RFC > just for that. RFC means patch is not ready for review and you just ask for some comments. Some maintainers even ignore RFC and wait till you send something ready. Best regards, Krzysztof
