> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] firmware: support i.MX95 SCMI BBM/MISC > Extenstion > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 08:56:04PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > i.MX95 System Manager Firmware source: > > > > > To generate html from the repo: make html > > > > i.MX95 System Manager Firmware support vendor extension > protocol: > > - Battery Backed Module(BBM) Protocol > > This protocol is intended provide access to the battery-backed > module. > > This contains persistent storage (GPR), an RTC, and the ON/OFF > button. > > The protocol can also provide access to similar functions > implemented via > > external board components. The BBM protocol provides functions to: > > > > - Describe the protocol version. > > - Discover implementation attributes. > > - Read/write GPR > > - Discover the RTCs available in the system. > > - Read/write the RTC time in seconds and ticks > > - Set an alarm (per LM) in seconds > > - Get notifications on RTC update, alarm, or rollover. > > - Get notification on ON/OFF button activity. > > > > - MISC Protocol for misc settings > > This includes controls that are misc settings/actions that must be > > exposed from the SM to agents. They are device specific and are > usually > > define to access bit fields in various mix block control modules, > > IOMUX_GPR, and other GPR/CSR owned by the SM. > > This protocol supports the following functions: > > > > - Describe the protocol version. > > - Discover implementation attributes. > > - Set/Get a control. > > - Initiate an action on a control. > > - Obtain platform (i.e. SM) build information. > > - Obtain ROM passover data. > > - Read boot/shutdown/reset information for the LM or the system. > > > > This patchset is to support the two protocols and users that use the > > protocols. The upper protocol infomation is also included in patch 1 > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > Changes in v7: > > - Just correct R-b tag from Rob to drop quotes "", and rebased > > - Link to v6: > > I specifically asked you to avoid re-spinning just for this reason within > 20 mins from your response, yet you managed to churn it within that > time 🙁. > I must respond at flash speed to avoid such things in the future 😢. > The V6 patchset was posted at 2024-07-18, and Krzysztof raised that R-b tag comment at 2024-7-21, so just after I posted the reply and started doing the new version, since it is a simple update, it takes short time to do v7. Since 6.11-rc1 merge window is closed, I think a clean patchset would be good for maintainers to apply. As I replied in the v6, I not intend to bring trouble for your reviewing. I will wait more time before doing a new version. Sorry, again! Thanks, Peng. > -- > Regards, > Sudeep
