> +static int dwc_eqos_rxmux_setup(void *priv, bool external)
> +{
> + int i = 0;
> + struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *plat = priv;
> + struct clk *rx1 = NULL;
> + struct clk *rx2 = NULL;
> + struct clk *rx3 = NULL;
Reverse Christmas tree please.
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data {
> void (*ptp_clk_freq_config)(struct stmmac_priv *priv);
> int (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv);
> void (*exit)(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv);
> + int (*rxmux_setup)(void *priv, bool external);
> struct mac_device_info *(*setup)(void *priv);
> int (*clks_config)(void *priv, bool enabled);
> int (*crosststamp)(ktime_t *device, struct system_counterval_t *system,
It would be good if one of the stmmas Maintainers looked at
this. There are already a lot of function pointers here, we should not
be added another one if one of the exiting ones could be used.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
