On 30/07/2024 00:03, Patrick Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 05:23:06PM +0800, Delphine CC Chiu wrote:
>> Add RTQ6056 (spider board 3rd source) support in yosemite4 DTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dts | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dts
>> index f73719b3c2f1..03a1e41312e3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dts
>> @@ -1240,35 +1240,35 @@ adc@37 {
>> };
>>
>> power-sensor@40 {
>> - compatible = "ti,ina233";
>> + compatible = "ti,ina233", "richtek,rtq6056";
>
> Is this legal to have two chips both listed as compatible? I thought
> this approach has been rejected before.
>
Testing would tell... This was clearly not tested and is just ridiculous.
It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
`make dtbs_check W=1` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
for instructions).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
