Tests on the rk3568v2 and rk3568v3 show that a reduced "baudclk" (e.g. 80MHz, compared to the standard 300MHz) significantly increases the possibility of incorrect FIFO counters, i.e. erratum 5. Print an info message if the clock is below the known good value of 300MHz. Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c index cd4e951f56d6..02291bd77deb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c @@ -741,6 +741,13 @@ static void rkcanfd_register_done(const struct rkcanfd_priv *priv) FIELD_GET(RKCANFD_REG_RTL_VERSION_MAJOR, dev_id), FIELD_GET(RKCANFD_REG_RTL_VERSION_MINOR, dev_id), priv->devtype_data.quirks); + + if (priv->devtype_data.quirks & RKCANFD_QUIRK_RK3568_ERRATUM_5 && + priv->can.clock.freq < RKCANFD_ERRATUM_5_SYSCLOCK_HZ_MIN) + netdev_info(priv->ndev, + "Erratum 5: CAN clock frequency (%luMHz) lower than known good (%luMHz), expect degraded performance\n", + priv->can.clock.freq / MEGA, + RKCANFD_ERRATUM_5_SYSCLOCK_HZ_MIN / MEGA); } static int rkcanfd_register(struct rkcanfd_priv *priv) -- 2.43.0
