On 26/07/2024 17:03, Mateusz Majewski wrote: > Forgot to mention it in the cover letter, but as discussed in v1 in > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPLW+4nfEjP4FDjRJORyyKk46x4VfFAcMuK88jXUT_LJoP1N_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > this requires support for the TMU clock to run, available in > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240723163311.28654-2-semen.protsenko@xxxxxxxxxx. > This series builds fine without this, only it is not possible to write a > devicetree source for this without the mentioned series, so as I > understand it is ok for this to be in review anyway? It's okay. Also okay for merging via thermal tree, after merge window. Only DTS will depend on the clock binding patch, which you will have to mention in cover letter or patch changelog (---). > > By the way, I am going to have some more time to help with the upstream > kernel, and have access to most of the supported SoCs. If you feel that > it is appropriate, I would be very happy to become one of the > maintainers of this driver :) If you have time, I think it would be great. +1 Reviews, tests, cleanups and any other non-developer activities are welcomed anyway, regardless whether you are listed as maintainer or not. Just set yourself a lei filter for specific keywords (e.g. samsung-soc list or dfn: for paths) and just review all the code on the lists. Best regards, Krzysztof
