On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 11:26, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) <quic_skakitap@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>>>> - I see that most if not all RCG clocks use rcg2_shared ops instead of > >>>>> using simple rcg2 ops, could you please clarify that? > >>>> As per the HW design recommendation, RCG needs to be parked at a safe > >>>> clock source(XO) in the disable path, shared_ops is used to achieve the > >>>> same. > >>> Does it apply to SM8150? For example, on SM8250 RCG2s are not parked. > >> > >> Yes, it applies to SM8150. > > Should the same logic be applied to other chipsets supported upstream? > > If this is the case, which chipsets? > > > I will evaluate for what all chipsets it is applicable and post a series > to fix it. Thanks a lot! -- With best wishes Dmitry
