On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:54:10 +0200, krzk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >On 25/07/2024 15:17, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: >> >> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:12:51 +0000, wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: shuaijie wang <wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Add device tree bindings for aw9610x proximity sensor. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: shuaijie wang <wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml >>> >> >> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: >> >> yamllint warnings/errors: >> >> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: >> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml: $id: Cannot determine base path from $id, relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename >> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/awinic,aw9610x.yaml >> file: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml > >Look, still not tested. > >You got comment on v3 that you must it prior to sending. The comment >also explained how to perform the testing. > >You responded that you will implement testing but as easily we can see >here, you still did not test it. > >Please, stop wasting our time. TEST your patches BEFORE sending. > >Best regards, >Krzysztof Hi Krzysztof, I'm extremely sorry for wasting your time, and I feel incredibly guilty about it. I did see the information before, but for some reason, I didn't submit the correct patch. I apologize again for the inconvenience. I will fix this issue in the next version. Kind regards, Wang Shuaijie
