On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 04:15:41PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote: > > On 7/19/24 20:25, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 03:15:10PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote: > > > boot-gpio (along with reset-gpio) is used to enable bootloader backdoor > > > for flashing new firmware. > > > > > > The pin and pin level to enabel bootloader backdoor is configed using > > > the following CCFG variables in cc1352p7: > > > - SET_CCFG_BL_CONFIG_BL_PIN_NO > > > - SET_CCFG_BL_CONFIG_BL_LEVEL > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml > > > index 3dde10de4630..a3511bb59b05 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,cc1352p7.yaml > > > @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ properties: > > > reset-gpios: > > > maxItems: 1 > > > + boot-gpios: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > I think this needs a description that explains what this is actually > > for, and "boot-gpios" is not really an accurate name for what it is used > > for IMO. > > I was using the name `boot-gpios` since cc1352-flasher uses the name > boot-line. Anyway, would `bsl-gpios` be better? I dunno, I think that "bsl" is worse. > Or for more descriptive > names, I guess it can be `bootloader-config-gpios` or > `bootloader-backdoor-gpios`. This is the most descriptive and therefore, IMO, best.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
