On 12/07/2024 18:01, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
Hi Jai On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 06:40:04PM GMT, Jai Luthra wrote:Use get_frame_desc() to get the frame desc from the connected source, and use the provided virtual channel instead of hardcoded one. get_frame_desc() works per stream, but as we don't support multiple streams yet, we will just always use stream 0. If the source doesn't support get_frame_desc(), fall back to the previous method of always capturing virtual channel 0. Co-developed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@xxxxxx> --- .../media/platform/ti/j721e-csi2rx/j721e-csi2rx.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti/j721e-csi2rx/j721e-csi2rx.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti/j721e-csi2rx/j721e-csi2rx.c index b4b4bb69c88a..c0916ca1a6f8 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti/j721e-csi2rx/j721e-csi2rx.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti/j721e-csi2rx/j721e-csi2rx.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #define SHIM_DMACNTX_EN BIT(31) #define SHIM_DMACNTX_YUV422 GENMASK(27, 26) #define SHIM_DMACNTX_SIZE GENMASK(21, 20) +#define SHIM_DMACNTX_VC GENMASK(9, 6) #define SHIM_DMACNTX_FMT GENMASK(5, 0) #define SHIM_DMACNTX_YUV422_MODE_11 3 #define SHIM_DMACNTX_SIZE_8 0 @@ -105,6 +106,8 @@ struct ti_csi2rx_ctx { struct media_pad pad; u32 sequence; u32 idx; + u32 vc; + u32 stream; }; struct ti_csi2rx_dev { @@ -571,6 +574,7 @@ static void ti_csi2rx_setup_shim(struct ti_csi2rx_ctx *ctx) } reg |= FIELD_PREP(SHIM_DMACNTX_SIZE, fmt->size); + reg |= FIELD_PREP(SHIM_DMACNTX_VC, ctx->vc); writel(reg, csi->shim + SHIM_DMACNTX(ctx->idx)); @@ -844,6 +848,33 @@ static void ti_csi2rx_buffer_queue(struct vb2_buffer *vb) } } +static int ti_csi2rx_get_vc(struct ti_csi2rx_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct ti_csi2rx_dev *csi = ctx->csi; + struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc fd; + struct media_pad *pad; + int ret, i; + + pad = media_entity_remote_pad_unique(&csi->subdev.entity, MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE); + if (!pad) + return -ENODEV; + + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(csi->source, pad, get_frame_desc, pad->index, + &fd); + if (ret) + return ret;Would it be better to fail at bound() time if the remote subdev doesn't support get_frame_desc ? you can use if (!v4l2_subdev_has_op(subdev, pad, get_frame_desc)) {+ + if (fd.type != V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_CSI2) + return -EINVAL; + + for (i = 0; i < fd.num_entries; i++) {for (unsigned int i should num_entries be validated ?+ if (ctx->stream == fd.entry[i].stream) + return fd.entry[i].bus.csi2.vc; + } + + return -ENODEV; +} + static int ti_csi2rx_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count) { struct ti_csi2rx_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); @@ -864,6 +895,14 @@ static int ti_csi2rx_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count) if (ret) goto err; + ret = ti_csi2rx_get_vc(ctx); + if (ret == -ENOIOCTLCMD) + ctx->vc = 0;Ah, so you fallback to 0 in case the subdev doesn't support get_frame_desc. I'm not sure what would be better here maybe wait for other's opinions as well. Personally I would fail earlier to make sure subdev drivers are forced to impement get_frame_desc
As this driver is already in upstream, with single-stream support, I think requiring frame_desc could break currently working setups.
I do a similar thing as above in CAL and RPi CFE drivers. Tomi
