Hi, Julien: On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. > From: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This driver provides a path to bypass the SoC ISP so that image data > coming from the SENINF can go directly into memory without any image > processing. This allows the use of an external ISP. > > Signed-off-by: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > [Paul Elder fix irq locking] > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- [snip] > +#define IMG_MAX_WIDTH5376U > +#define IMG_MAX_HEIGHT4032U > +#define IMG_DEF_WIDTH1920U > +#define IMG_DEF_HEIGHT1080U > Why do you define default width/height? Does 1920x1080 have any benefit? If so, add comment to describe why choose 1920x1080. If no, I think using IMG_MAX_WIDTH/IMG_MAX_HEIGHT as default is a good choice because we could drop this redundant definition and let hardware work in its best quality. Regards, CK
