On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 08:37:34PM +0200, Pawel Dembicki wrote: > This patch switches hardcoded RGMII transmit/receive delay to > a configurable value. Delay values are taken from the properties of > the CPU port: 'tx-internal-delay-ps' and 'rx-internal-delay-ps'. > > The default value is configured to 2.0 ns to maintain backward > compatibility with existing code. > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c > index d9d3e30fd47a..7d3c8176dff7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/vitesse-vsc73xx-core.c > @@ -684,6 +684,67 @@ vsc73xx_update_vlan_table(struct vsc73xx *vsc, int port, u16 vid, bool set) > return vsc73xx_write_vlan_table_entry(vsc, vid, portmap); > } > > +static void vsc73xx_configure_rgmii_port_delay(struct dsa_switch *ds) > +{ > + /* Keep 2.0 ns delay for backward complatibility */ > + u32 tx_delay = VSC73XX_GMIIDELAY_GMII0_GTXDELAY_2_0_NS; > + u32 rx_delay = VSC73XX_GMIIDELAY_GMII0_RXDELAY_2_0_NS; > + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, CPU_PORT); > + struct device_node *port_dn = dp->dn; > + struct vsc73xx *vsc = ds->priv; > + u32 delay; > + > + if (!of_property_read_u32(port_dn, "tx-internal-delay-ps", &delay)) { > + switch (delay) { > + case 0: > + tx_delay = VSC73XX_GMIIDELAY_GMII0_GTXDELAY_NONE; > + break; > + case 1400: > + tx_delay = VSC73XX_GMIIDELAY_GMII0_GTXDELAY_1_4_NS; > + break; > + case 1700: > + tx_delay = VSC73XX_GMIIDELAY_GMII0_GTXDELAY_1_7_NS; > + break; > + case 2000: > + break; > + default: > + dev_warn(vsc->dev, > + "Unsupported RGMII Transmit Clock Delay, set to 2.0 ns\n"); I would suggest you make this dev_err() and return -EINVAL. The DT has a real error in it which should be fixed. > + break; > + } > + } else { > + dev_info(vsc->dev, > + "RGMII Transmit Clock Delay isn't configured, set to 2.0 ns\n"); This is for backwards compatibility. Do we need to spam the log? I would say dev_dbg(). Same for RX please. Andrew