在2024年7月17日七月 下午9:06，Huacai Chen写道： > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:12 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> 在2024年7月16日七月 下午5:40，Huacai Chen写道： >> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 3:00 PM Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 在2024年7月15日七月 下午2:39，Huacai Chen写道： >> >> [...] >> >> > >> >> >> You said that you've accepted my suggestion, which means you recognize >> >> >> 'loongson' as the better name for the drivers. >> >> > No, I don't think so, this is just a compromise to keep consistency. >> >> >> >> Folks, can we settle on this topic? >> >> >> >> Is this naming really important? As long as people can read actual chip name from >> >> kernel code & documents, I think both are acceptable. >> >> >> >> I suggest let this patch go as is. And if anyone want to unify the naming, they can >> >> propose a treewide patch. >> > Renaming still breaks config files. >> >> This is trival with treewide sed :-) > Please read the commit message of b8d3349803ba34afda429e87a837fd95a carefully. We don't have 114 defconfigs don't we? Those symbols are not frequently specified by down stream users either. I think Keguang had tried his best on resolving all reasonable comments. Naming is a matter of preference after all, I think we should give Keguang some respect here. Thanks - Jiaxun > > Huacai > >> >> Thanks >> - Jiaxun >> >> -- >> - Jiaxun -- - Jiaxun
