On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:05:10AM GMT, Chen Wang wrote: > > On 2024/7/16 23:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 08:43:19PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote: > > > On 2024/7/16 17:42, Haylen Chu wrote: > > > > Add devicetree binding documentation for thermal sensors integrated in > > > > Sophgo CV180X SoCs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Haylen Chu <heylenay@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > I see sometimes you call it cv1800, and in patch 3, the file name is > > > cv180x_thermal.c, and for dts changes, you changed cv18xx.dtsi. Please unify > > > it. > > > > > > I think sg200x is new name for cv181x serias, so if you want to cover > > > cv180x/sg200x, is cv18xx better? > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..58bd4432cd10 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: Sophgo CV1800 on-SoC Thermal Sensor > > > > + > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Haylen Chu <heylenay@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > + > > > > +description: Sophgo CV1800 on-SoC thermal sensor > > > > + > > > > +properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + enum: > > > > + - sophgo,cv1800-thermal > > > cv18xx-thermal ? > > Please, no wildcards in compatibles :/ > > Sorry for my confusion. > > Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it > everywhere? > This should depend. If this peripheral is SoC specific, it is OK for using SoC specific compatible. Otherwise, it should be series specific. For thermal sensors, I suggest using series-based compatible name as this peripheral is the same across the whole series IIRC. > Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800. SoC specific compatible means most of the SoC have different part for this peripheral. For safety, it may not use the fallback generic compatible. Regards, Inochi
