Hi Diederik, On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 02:34:40PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > [...] > rngtest: starting FIPS tests... > rngtest: bits received from input: 20000032 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2 successes: 362 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 638 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Monobit: 634 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Poker: 106 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Runs: 43 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Long run: 0 > rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Continuous run: 0 > rngtest: input channel speed: (min=2.638; avg=139.351; max=9765625.000)Kibits/s > rngtest: FIPS tests speed: (min=21.169; avg=36.158; max=68.610)Mibits/s > rngtest: Program run time: 148109761 microseconds > =============================================================== > > That's almost twice as many failures as successes ... That's bad news, and apparently different from Aurelien's initial testing of the driver. Can you try if the result is also that bad when using his version of the driver: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20221128184718.1963353-3-aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx/ If so, we can try to increase RK_RNG_SAMPLE_CNT, and we may need different values depending on the SoC...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
