On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:39:29PM +0800, Tengfei Fan wrote: > Document the SMMU on the QCS9100 platform. > QCS9100 is drived from SA8775p. Currently, both the QCS9100 and SA8775p > platform use non-SCMI resource. In the future, the SA8775p platform will > move to use SCMI resources and it will have new sa8775p-related device > tree. Consequently, introduce "qcom,qcs9100-smmu-500" to describe > non-SCMI based SMMU. > > Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Introduce support for the QCS9100 SoC device tree (DTSI) and the > QCS9100 RIDE board DTS. The QCS9100 is a variant of the SA8775p. > While the QCS9100 platform is still in the early design stage, the > QCS9100 RIDE board is identical to the SA8775p RIDE board, except it > mounts the QCS9100 SoC instead of the SA8775p SoC. > > The QCS9100 SoC DTSI is directly renamed from the SA8775p SoC DTSI, and > all the compatible strings will be updated from "SA8775p" to "QCS9100". > The QCS9100 device tree patches will be pushed after all the device tree > bindings and device driver patches are reviewed. > > The final dtsi will like: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-3-quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > The detailed cover letter reference: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-1-quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > --- > Changes in v2: > - Split huge patch series into different patch series according to > subsytems > - Update patch commit message > > prevous disscussion here: > [1] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240703025850.2172008-1-quic_tengfan@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Sorry, but this doesn't apply against my bindings branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=for-joerg/arm-smmu/bindings Will
