Quoting Heiko Stübner (2024-07-10 01:02:57) > Am Dienstag, 9. Juli 2024, 23:45:20 CEST schrieb Stephen Boyd: > > Quoting Heiko Stuebner (2024-07-09 05:31:16) > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-generator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-generator.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000000..f44e61e414e89 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-generator.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ [...] > > > > Maybe instead of creating a generic binding just make a binding for > > these diodes parts? It certainly looks like a generic binding could come > > later when another vendor supports the same binding. > > I was actually primarily aiming at solving the Rock 5 ITX clock generator > issue described in patch 5, where the 100 MHz clock generator is just > described as "100MHz,3.3V,3225" in the schematics, but definitly needs > the supply regulator to be enabled [1]. That looks like a VCO (voltage controlled oscillator). Maybe the compatible string can be "voltage-oscillator" or "clock-vco" and it can require the vdd-supply. Those diodes parts look different. They look like PLLs that have a reference clock, hence the 'clocks' property I was expecting to see. That would use the VCO you have to make the PCIE reference clk frequencies. A generic compatible for those diodes parts is likely "phase-locked-loop", or "clock-pll", but I'd avoid that given that PLLs are almost always complicated and can have multiple output frequencies if they have post and pre-dividers, etc. It's easier to be specific here and make a binding for the part you have.