Erez <erezgeva2@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 09:12, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 7/3/24 12:16 AM, Erez wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 07:00, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> The table below uses fixed width characters. >>> >>> ID Part. Size Status SFDP status >>> according to spec. >>> New chip with >>> SFDP for EOL >>> c22012 MX25L2005(A) SZ_256K = 2Mb EOL MX25L2006E >>> c22532 MX25U2033E SZ_256K = 2Mb EOL >>> c22013 MX25L4005A SZ_512K = 4Mb EOL >>> c22533 MX25U4035 SZ_512K = 4Mb EOL >>> c22534 MX25U8035 SZ_1M = 8Mb EOL >>> c22016 MX25L3205D SZ_4M = 32Mb EOL MX25L3233F >>> c29e16 MX25L3255E SZ_4M = 32Mb EOL >>> c22017 MX25L6405D SZ_8M = 64Mb EOL >>> c22018 MX25L12805D SZ_16M = 128Mb EOL MX25L12833F >>> c22538 MX25U12835F SZ_16M = 128Mb EOL >>> c2253a MX66U51235F SZ_64M = 512Mb EOL MX25U51245G >>> c22010 MX25L512E SZ_64K = 512Kb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22015 MX25L1606E SZ_2M = 16Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22536 MX25U3235F SZ_4M = 32Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22816 MX25R3235F SZ_4M = 32Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22537 MX25U6435F SZ_8M = 64Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22019 MX25L25635E SZ_32M = 256Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c22539 MX25U25635F SZ_32M = 256Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c2201a MX66L51235F SZ_64M = 512Mb NO_REC Have-SFDP! >>> c2261b MX66L1G55G SZ_128M = 1Gb NO_REC Spec. is not public >>> c22314 MX25V8035F SZ_1M = 8Mb PROD Have-SFDP! >>> c22815 MX25R1635F SZ_2M = 16Mb PROD Have-SFDP! >>> c2201b MX66L1G45G SZ_128M = 1Gb PROD Have-SFDP! >>> c2253c MX66U2G45G SZ_256M = 2Gb PROD Have-SFDP! >>> c2253a MX25U51245G SZ_64M = 512Mb PROD Have-SFDP! >>> >>> EOL End of Life >>> PROD Normal Production >>> NO_REC Not recommend for new design >>> >>> >> >> not sure what you want me to do with these. > > That we can read SFDP for all chips from Macronix. > Only old chips before 2010 do not have SFDP. So, should we try and identify new chips (with SFDP) that re-use the ID of all the above mentioned EOL chips that does not have SFDP? As I read the communication from Macronix, then we should expect new chips re-using the ID for all of them. It is just a matter of digging. /Esben
