On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 9.07.2024 8:39 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related clocks and > > there is no NoC scaling. Linux itself handles these clocks. > > However, these should not be exposed as just clocks and align > > with other Qualcomm SoCs that handle these clocks from a > > interconnect provider. > > > > Hence include icc provider capability to the gcc node so that > > peripherals can use the interconnect facility to enable these > > clocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Doesn't the USB host need to have its path described to keep working? Presently, USB host enables GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK directly using the clocks/clock-name entries. So it is not dependent on ICC. Shall I update the USB DT node to use interconnects now itself, or wait until this IPQ5332 ICC enablement series is approved? Please let me know. Thanks Varada
