On Mo, 2024-07-01 at 15:42 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:47:50PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > On Fr, 2024-06-28 at 17:21 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 10:35:51AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > > Add compatible for EXC81W32 touchscreen controllers.
> > >
> > > Could you please mention in your commit messages what makes a fallback
> > > compatible inappropriate here?
> >
> > thank for pointing this out. Actually, I'm not sure a fallback
> > compatible is inappropriate at all. There just is none currently, even
> > though EXC80H60 and EXC80H84 already look compatible to me.
> >
> > To my understanding, there's EXC80[WH]{32,46,60,84} models, that should
> > only differ in ball pitch (W or H) and targeted display size (the last
> > number).
> > I don't know if there are actual relevant differences between what I
> > assume are model generations, such as EXC80 to EXC81. At least the
> > limited currently implemented feature set in the exc3000 driver is
> > identical.
> >
> > Given that EXC80H60, EXC80H84, and now EXC81W32 all share the same 16K
> > resolution and the same message format (possible differences in
> > capability to measure touch area nonwithstanding), should I prepend
> > this series with a patch:
>
> If you're prepared to update the two users to avoid adding more
> dtbs_check warnings, sure.
I'll follow up with another patch series, thanks.
regards
Philipp
