> -----Original Message-----
> From: Biju Das
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 6:37 AM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 04/12] i2c: riic: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
>
> Hi Andi and Claudiu,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 11:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] i2c: riic: Use
> > pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> >
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c index 83e4d5e14ab6..002b11b020fa
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> > > @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ struct riic_irq_desc {
> > > char *name;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const char * const riic_rpm_err_msg = "Failed to runtime
> > > +resume";
> >
> > Please, don't do this. Much clearer to write the message explicitly.
> >
> > > +
> > > static inline void riic_writeb(struct riic_dev *riic, u8 val, u8
> > > offset) {
> > > writeb(val, riic->base + riic->info->regs[offset]); @@ -133,10
> > > +135,14 @@ static int riic_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct
> > > +i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
> > > struct riic_dev *riic = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> > > struct device *dev = adap->dev.parent;
> > > unsigned long time_left;
> > > - int i;
> > > + int i, ret;
> > > u8 start_bit;
> > >
> > > - pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> >
> > In principle I like the error message to be always checked and I will
> > always approve it. Whenever there is a return value, even when we are sure it's always '0', it
> needs to be checked.
> >
> > I had lots of discussions in the past about this topic but I haven't
> > always found support. I'd love to have the ack from a renesas maintainer here.
> >
> > > + if (ret) {
>
> Checking ret will lead to imbalance. It should be ret < 0 as ret = 1 corresponds to RPM_ACTIVE and
> the API does not call put() when ret = 1; see [1] and [2]
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L778
>
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc6/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L431
I got confused. the code for pm_runtime_resume_and_get() seems correct.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L436
>
>
> Another question, pm_runtime_put [3] can also return error, don't we need to propagate that as well
> to caller??
>
> [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1086
>
> Cheers,
> Biju
