On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote : > > > > Sorry but NACK. > > > > I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real > > benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late. > > yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical > > so I’ll pass on the NACK > If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and completely drop the current mess? > > > > Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by > > multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our > > current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example). > > > > Others already do so and this is not complex at all > -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
