On Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:10:46 +0100,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 02.07.24 18:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:21:55 +0100,
> > Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> There is an issue with the identification of ATA drives with our
> >> P.A. Semi Nemo boards [1] after the
> >> commit "of/irq: Factor out parsing of interrupt-map parent
> >> phandle+args from of_irq_parse_raw()" [2].
> > [snip]
> >
> > My earlier request for valuable debug information still stands. But
> > while you're at it, can you please give the following hack a go?
> >
> > M.
> >
> > --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> > @@ -282,8 +282,10 @@ int of_irq_parse_raw(const __be32 *addr, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
> > oldimap = imap;
> > imap = of_irq_parse_imap_parent(oldimap, imaplen, out_irq);
> > - if (!imap)
> > - goto fail;
> > + if (!imap) {
> > + match = 0;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > match &= of_device_is_available(out_irq->np);
> > if (match)
> >
> > This may not be the final workaround even if it solves your boot
> > problem, but will at least give us a hint at what is going wrong.
> >
> > I have the fuzzy feeling that we may be able to lob this broken system
> > as part of the of_irq_imap_abusers[] array, which would solve things
> > pretty "neatly".
> >
> > M.
> >
> We tested this patch yesterday and it solves the boot problem.
How about the other patch[1], which would be far preferable?
M.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/86ed8ba2sp.wl-maz@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
