Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2024 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rz-smarc: Replace fixed regulator for USB VBUS
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:01 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Replace the fixed regulator for USB VBUS and use the proper one that
> > controls regulator based on VBUS detection.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v4->v5:
> > * Updated commit description.
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rz-smarc-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/rz-smarc-common.dtsi
> > @@ -54,14 +54,6 @@ codec_dai: simple-audio-card,codec {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > - usb0_vbus_otg: regulator-usb0-vbus-otg {
> > - compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > -
> > - regulator-name = "USB0_VBUS_OTG";
> > - regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > - regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > - };
> > -
> > vccq_sdhi1: regulator-vccq-sdhi1 {
> > compatible = "regulator-gpio";
> > regulator-name = "SDHI1 VccQ"; @@ -139,6 +131,9 @@
> > &ohci1 {
> >
> > &phyrst {
> > status = "okay";
> > + usb0_vbus_otg: regulator-vbus {
>
> The label is not really needed, is it?
The label is used in usb2_phy0 node.
vbus-supply = <&usb0_vbus_otg>;
>
> > + regulator-name = "vbus";
> > + };
>
> Also, as the regulator-vbus subnode is required, perhaps it should be moved to the SoC-
> specific .dtsi? Or do you keep it here for board-specific control of the regulator name, i.e. to
> avoid conflicts?
Yes, just to avoid conflicts. Later I can move to individual SoC specific dtsi's
>
> > };
> >
> > &scif0 {
>
> Anyway, this adheres to the DT bindings, so
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Biju
