Hi Claudiu,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 12:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets
>
>
>
> On 28.06.2024 13:49, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 11:25 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays to
> >> describe the register offsets
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28.06.2024 11:24, Biju Das wrote:
> >>> Hi Claudiu,
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 9:13 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays
> >>>> to describe the register offsets
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 28.06.2024 11:09, Biju Das wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 9:03 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays
> >>>>>> to describe the register offsets
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 28.06.2024 10:55, Biju Das wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 8:32 AM
> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual
> >>>>>>>> arrays to describe the register offsets
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi, Biju,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 28.06.2024 08:59, Biju Das wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Claudiu,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 1:14 PM
> >>>>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 07/12] i2c: riic: Define individual arrays
> >>>>>>>>>> to describe the register offsets
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Define individual arrays to describe the register offsets. In
> >>>>>>>>>> this way we can describe different IP variants that share the
> >>>>>>>>>> same register offsets but have differences in other characteristics.
> >>>>>>>>>> Commit prepares for the addition
> >>>>>>>> of fast mode plus.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea
> >>>>>>>>>> <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>>>>>>> - none
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c | 58
> >>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> >>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c index
> >>>>>>>>>> 9fe007609076..8ffbead95492 100644
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-riic.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ enum riic_reg_list { };
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> struct riic_of_data {
> >>>>>>>>>> - u8 regs[RIIC_REG_END];
> >>>>>>>>>> + const u8 *regs;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Since you are touching this part, can we drop struct and Use
> >>>>>>>>> u8* as device_data instead?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Patch 09/12 "i2c: riic: Add support for fast mode plus" adds a
> >>>>>>>> new member to struct
> >>>>>> riic_of_data.
> >>>>>>>> That new member is needed to differentiate b/w hardware
> >>>>>>>> versions supporting fast mode plus based on compatible.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Are we sure RZ/A does not support fast mode plus?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From commit description of patch 09/12:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fast mode plus is available on most of the IP variants that RIIC
> >>>>>> driver is working with. The exception is (according to HW manuals
> >>>>>> of the SoCs where this IP is
> >>>> available) the Renesas RZ/A1H.
> >>>>>> For this, patch introduces the struct riic_of_data::fast_mode_plus.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I checked the manuals of all the SoCs where this driver is used.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I haven't checked the H/W manual?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On the manual I've downloaded from Renesas web site the FMPE bit
> >>>>>> of RIICnFER is not available on RZ/A1H.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I just found RZ/A2M manual, it supports FMP and register layout looks similar to RZ/G2L.
> >>>>
> >>>> I introduced struct riic_of_data::fast_mode_plus because of RZ/A1H.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe make the register layout as per SoC
> >>>
> >>> RZ/A1 --> &riic_rz_a_info
> >>> RZ/A2 and RZ/{G2L,G2LC,V2L,G2UL,FIVE} --> &riic_rz_g2_info RZ/G3S
> >>> and RZ/V2H --> &riic_rz_v2h_info
> >>
> >> Sorry, but I don't understand. Patch 09/12 already does that but a
> >> bit
> >> differently:
> >
> > Now register layout is added to differentiate the SoCs for adding
> > support to RZ/G3S and this layout should match with the hardware manual for all supported SoCs.
> > Currently it is wrong for RZ/A2 SoC, while you fixed it for all other SoCs.
>
> I checked RZ/A2M. There is nothing broken. The only thing that I see is that the FP+ is not enabled
> on RZ/A2M (please let me know if there is anything else I missed). I don't see this broken. It is
> the same behavior that was before this patch.
As per RZ/A2M hardware manual, ICFER register is present
While as per [1], you don't have this register. So according to me RZ/A2 SoC register
layout is broken and it is same as RZ/A1.
[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20240625121358.590547-10-claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Cheers,
Biju
