Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] riscv: Apply Zawrs when available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 05:36:42 PDT (-0700), ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Palmer,

I submit our concerns of wrs.nto to RVI ARC for consideration. They
discussed it but don't believe there's a need for concern. The
expectation is that there will always be enough interrupt activity
and that those interrupts with activity will not likely be locally
disabled.

Can we consider this series for 6.10?

Sorry I forgot about this one, Anup just brought it up in the patchwork meeting. He's going to ack the KVM bits, then I'll pick it up.


Thanks,
drew

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:08:20PM GMT, Andrew Jones wrote:
Zawrs provides two instructions (wrs.nto and wrs.sto), where both are
meant to allow the hart to enter a low-power state while waiting on a
store to a memory location. The instructions also both wait an
implementation-defined "short" duration (unless the implementation
terminates the stall for another reason). The difference is that while
wrs.sto will terminate when the duration elapses, wrs.nto, depending on
configuration, will either just keep waiting or an ILL exception will be
raised. Linux will use wrs.nto, so if platforms have an implementation
which falls in the "just keep waiting" category (which is not expected),
then it should _not_ advertise Zawrs in the hardware description.

Like wfi (and with the same {m,h}status bits to configure it), when
wrs.nto is configured to raise exceptions it's expected that the higher
privilege level will see the instruction was a wait instruction, do
something, and then resume execution following the instruction. For
example, KVM does configure exceptions for wfi (hstatus.VTW=1) and
therefore also for wrs.nto. KVM does this for wfi since it's better to
allow other tasks to be scheduled while a VCPU waits for an interrupt.
For waits such as those where wrs.nto/sto would be used, which are
typically locks, it is also a good idea for KVM to be involved, as it
can attempt to schedule the lock holding VCPU.

This series starts with Christoph's addition of the riscv
smp_cond_load_relaxed function which applies wrs.sto when available.
That patch has been reworked to use wrs.nto and to use the same approach
as Arm for the wait loop, since we can't have arbitrary C code between
the load-reserved and the wrs. Then, hwprobe support is added (since the
instructions are also usable from usermode), and finally KVM is
taught about wrs.nto, allowing guests to see and use the Zawrs
extension.

We still don't have test results from hardware, and it's not possible to
prove that using Zawrs is a win when testing on QEMU, not even when
oversubscribing VCPUs to guests. However, it is possible to use KVM
selftests to force a scenario where we can prove Zawrs does its job and
does it well. [4] is a test which does this and, on my machine, without
Zawrs it takes 16 seconds to complete and with Zawrs it takes 0.25
seconds.

This series is also available here [1]. In order to use QEMU for testing
a build with [2] is needed. In order to enable guests to use Zawrs with
KVM using kvmtool, the branch at [3] may be used.

[1] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commits/riscv/zawrs-v3/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240312152901.512001-2-ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3] https://github.com/jones-drew/kvmtool/commits/riscv/zawrs/
[4] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commit/cb2beccebcece10881db842ed69bdd5715cfab5d

Thanks,
drew

v3:
 - Moved comment about expected termination from the DT binding text
   to a code comment.

v2:
 - Added DT bindings patch with additional Linux specifications due
   to wrs.nto potentially never terminating, as suggested by Palmer
 - Added patch to share pause insn definition
 - Rework main Zawrs support patch to use Arm approach (which is
   also the approach that Andrea Parri suggested)
 - Dropped the riscv implementation of smp_cond_load_acquire().
   afaict, the generic implementation, which will use the riscv
   implementation of smp_cond_load_relaxed() is sufficient for riscv.
 - The rework was large enough (IMO) to drop Heiko's s-o-b and to
   add myself as a co-developer


Andrew Jones (5):
  riscv: Provide a definition for 'pause'
  dt-bindings: riscv: Add Zawrs ISA extension description
  riscv: hwprobe: export Zawrs ISA extension
  KVM: riscv: Support guest wrs.nto
  KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Zawrs extension to get-reg-list test

Christoph M??llner (1):
  riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocks

 Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst          |  4 ++
 .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml |  7 +++
 arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 20 ++++---
 arch/riscv/Makefile                           |  3 -
 arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h              | 45 +++++++++-----
 arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h              | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h                |  1 +
 arch/riscv/include/asm/insn-def.h             |  4 ++
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h             |  1 +
 arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/processor.h       |  8 +--
 arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h         |  1 +
 arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h             |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c                |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c               |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c                         |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_insn.c                    | 15 +++++
 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c                  |  2 +
 .../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c        |  4 ++
 18 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--
2.44.0





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux